[edu]

and also please when you say, i wait at least 10 trades. In the same situation if the stretgy open 3 x0,01 orders they count as 1 or 3?

[edu]

Thank you, i already have the manual and i was thinking about the algo one.

Another question, if in the backtest it says

MAXIMUM CONSECUTIVE LOSS 4

and this strategy (one of the top 5 strategy of a ….) can open 3 orders of 0,01 if all go in SL they count like 1 LOSS or 3 LOSSES?

I tried to understand but wasn’t able

thank you

[edu]

Thank you very much, i appreciate it.

I will test

probabily tomorrow i will buy also the course about the three opening markets strategy (i forgot the name).

[edu]

Thank you as always.

When you find that one of the 10 Eas is not good,

do you search a substitute or do you leave only 9 eas?

thank you

[edu]

Hello Petko,

It seems the problem is solved. It is very strange.

Said That, i have three questions if you can answer:

1) Can i put 20 Eas all in one or only 10 for time?
2) Should i try to optimize every month the eas in each group? For Example all the EURUSD M1 1 etc…If yes, have i to optimize singularly one for one?
3) If i decide to put the 10 eas in real, if i change 0,01 with 0,1 the equity should remain the same, right? Only the Net profit and the DD change right?

Sorry for this questions but after that the thing on the previous message i am a little bit confused

thank you
Edoardo

[edu]

Hello,

yes it is very strange.

Another question why if i put 0,01 lots with that ea i am in profit:

and if i put 0,1 in am in huge loss.

Could it be because you created your strategy for 0,1 lots? If i use them in real, i want to use at least 0,1 lots

[edu]

Hello Petko
i used little criteria (i know you suggested 300 tested bar and i used them to create mine strategy)
here:

here the validator for example m1:

This is what i created for m1 instead:

I tried to generate m5 strategies but anyone was good enough

—————————————————————————————————————————————-

One problem can be that i have small data? for m1 i hae 75K candles.

Thank you for the warning, the problem is always find a broker who permits to take back money and for what i know not located in cyprus or malta

regards

[edu]

happy birthday, i have buyed your course. Now i have to test again 😉

[edu]

thank you again

i saw your new 100 Ea probably i am going to buy it with the new discount for you birthday 🙂

[edu]

(Please see the previous message before.)

New Update, after EURUSD-EURGBP-GBPUSD, i was able to collect more data for USDJPY

This is the before:

This is the after:

This IS Monte carlo:

If you can give me your opinion also about this and the other in the previous post would be highly appreciate

Edu

[edu]

Me too as entrepreneur, i have no fixed day off.
————————————————————

I understand the problem and i did it again here the results:
<br />what is the boiling point for aluminum<br />

it seems that it has huge drawdown (when i use an Ea in real i typicaly use 0,10 lots)

I also did the montecarlo test (that i finally understand how it works)

<br />what is the boiling point for aluminum<br />

<br />what is the boiling point for aluminum<br />

How it looks to you? My broker and this strategy work well together?

—————————————————————————————————————————-

Now i have 3 good “looking” EA (EURUSD-EURGBP-GBPUSD), 1 (USDJPY) With too little data (but in demo in 5 days it closed everyday in loss) and this.

Probably i will buy the 99 ea course even if testing all of them would be difficoult considerinf FX blue doesn’t track very well the magic numbers

Thank you again
Edu

[edu]

Wow thank you i wasn’t aspecting a reply on saturday.

So i tried as you said, here i removed the “acceptance criteria” and the equity changed

after i try to put bigger criteria, but anything changed

So i try the montecarlo test. First parameter

then the second (doesn’t look good)

What do you think? Should i remove this from the demo and try another ea?

————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Before i didn’t explain well, i was asking:

If Monete carlo test:

– Give me an equity similiar to my ea’s equity ——-> Good Strategy and not overoptimize
– Give me a different equity ——-> overoptimize strategy

is this correct?

Thank you and again have a good weekend
Edu

[edu]

Good Evening,

yes obviously i will never ask to you to suggest me to invest. Today I tried the GBPJPY with the expert aadvisor studio after i have tried for 5 days this strategy in demo (every day in loss)

this is the results:

<br />is ammonia harmful<br />

I tried also to optime (after i watched your videos) but anything changed. What should i try?

i would like also to ask you in a monte carlo test how i recognize an overoptimize strategy?

have a nice weekend
Edu

[edu]

perfect i am happy to hear that My Monte Carlo tests went good.

I tried also to increase the “number of tests” from 20 to 40 and it keeps to look almost the same. Should i change others parameters?

From your experience now that you have confirmed me that this two strategies look robust, what should i do?

A) Test in real
b) Keep to collect more data

and also should i try to optimize it every month like you do?

EDU

[edu]

Good Morning Petko,

i did the montecarlo test as you said.

The results seems good, what do you think?

EURGBP
First parameter

second parameter

and this was the equity

GBPUSD
first parameter

second parameter

and this was the equity

[Author]

Posts